Paul McKeag,: 2006
Introduction
There are two types of waves on water: gravity waves and capillary
waves. Gravity waves are longer wavelength and travel slowly,
whereas capillary waves have very short wavelengths and travel
faster than gravity waves.
The restoring force for gravity weaves is provided only by the
weight of water displaced. The velocity equation for gravity waves
is:
Waves that have a wavelength of less than or equal to ~1 cm
are defined as capillary waves. Capillary waves are strongly
influenced by surface tension because of their small size. The
velocity of capillary waves spreading across water is higher than
gravity waves. The velocity of capillary waves increases as wavelengths
shorten.
Research Question
How does the velocity of short wavelengths on water depend on
wavelength?
Hypothesis
The capillary waves will not fit with the gravity wave curve.
They will decrease slightly, and then they will increase once
the frequency is increased to a point where gravity overpowers
the force of surface tension.
Materials and procedure
A speaker (shown
at right) was connected to a sine wave signal generator and amplifier.
A plastic playing card holder was taped securely to the center
of the speaker diaphragm.
Fig 2 The experimental setup. Black paper was put under the clear card container to make the waves more visible. |
Five mm of water was added to the tank and black paper was placed underneath to increase the contrast in images of ripples on the water. A ruler was placed close to the tank and two small beads were placed underneath to reduce friction.
![]() Fig 3 - beads in place below the tank. |
Photographs
Higher frequency waves were photographed inside, because the waves were more easily seen on the reflection of ceiling lights. Low frequency waves were more easily seen out-doors with the sky as a reflection. Several pictures were taken of each wavelength, generated by a different frequency.
Data
Table 1
Frequency, wavelength and velocity (fl) for short wavelength standing waves on water.
(±1 Hz) |
(meters) ±5% |
(m/s) ±5% |
|
|
|
The data in Table 1 is plotted in Graph 1. The calculated gravity wave curve is shown on the bottom in comparison to the velocities over the wavelengths of the waves in the experiment. The red line shows the sharp split between capillary waves and gravity waves. The changeover point is found to be at about 6 mm.
Analysis:
Graph 1 shows that the clear differentiation between higher frequency waves and lower frequency waves. The lower frequency waves of 10, 15, and 20 Hz follow almost parallel to the gravity curve, but the higher frequencies from 50 Hz and up don't follow the gravity curve. They are more affected by the surface tension of the water.
The velocity of the equivalent gravity waves was calculated with the formula....
Discussion
The waves were hard to see, especially for the higher frequencies.
The amplitude had to be adjusted so that there were no waves
resonating from the sides of the container. The higher frequency
waves were easier to see inside a room with fluorescent lighting,
while the lower frequency waves were better seen outdoors.
There were limitations as to how high and low the frequencies
could be measured. The highest was 350 Hz because that was
the minimum visible wavelength. The lowest was 10 Hz because
the speaker was unable to move at any lower frequency.
Evaluation
The setup of the experiment was simple and efficient. At
first, the experiment was tried without the beads under the water
dish. It was found that measuring the higher frequencies
like this was more difficult. Lower frequencies wouldn't
work at all without the beads. Perhaps if a student wanted
to measure lower frequencies, they could use a sub woofer, or
even a woofer which is designed to reverberate at much lower frequencies
than the small speaker used in the experiment. The small
container used for the water was made of plastic and was small
enough that waves were vibrating along the sides and creating
crossing standing waves. A student could redo the experiment
similarly with a stationary container and a small wave wall inside
that is connected to the speaker. This would eliminate the
side wave interference caused by the vibrations of a single object. It
is possible that this technique in a k larger tank would give
more accurate data for wavelengths in the 1-3 cm region. Future
continuations of this lab could include using Alcohol or Mercury
instead of water.